Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 95.0 TH/s |
| 2,385 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 14,500.0 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 79% more hashrate (53.0 vs 95.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 79% more hashrate (53.0 vs 95.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 27% better power draw (2,385 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 24% better efficacité (45.0 vs 34.2 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 34% better weight (9,500 vs 14,500 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 36% more heat output (8,138 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $215 |
| -$3.82 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 1 year | -$1,815 |
| -$3,061 | Net after 2 years | -$3,414 |
| -$4,454 | Net after 3 years | -$5,014 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.82/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH — a difference of 10.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (45.0 vs 34.2 J/TH).