Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 95.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 91% better efficacité (372.3 vs 34.2 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)'s favour. That said, the Antminer KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 911% more hashrate (9.4 vs 95.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 7% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 91% better efficacité (372.3 vs 34.2 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 10% better weight (16.1 vs 14.5 kg)
- Antminer KS3 8% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $215 |
| -$8.13 | Daily net profit | -$5.03 |
| -$10,966 | Net after 1 year | -$2,053 |
| -$13,932 | Net after 2 years | -$3,890 |
| -$16,898 | Net after 3 years | -$5,728 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) is more profitable at $-5.03/day compared to $-8.13/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH — a difference of 338.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficacité (372.3 vs 34.2 J/TH).