Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 95.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 5267% more hashrate (1.8 vs 95.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer D9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 5267% more hashrate (1.8 vs 95.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 13% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 34.2 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 10% better weight (16.1 vs 14.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 14% more heat output (9,687 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $215 |
| -$6.76 | Daily net profit | -$5.04 |
| -$5,468 | Net after 1 year | -$2,055 |
| -$7,936 | Net after 2 years | -$3,894 |
| -$10,405 | Net after 3 years | -$5,734 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) is more profitable at $-5.04/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH — a difference of 1,569.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 34.2 J/TH).