Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 1,077 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,675 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
Ebang Ebit E9
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 789% more hashrate (56.0 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)'s favour. The Ebang Ebit E9 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Ebang Ebit E9 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 789% more hashrate (56.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9 57% better power draw (2,520 vs 1,077 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 74% better efficacité (45.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 134% more heat output (8,598 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E9 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $370 |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | -$2.36 |
| -$1,885 | Net after 1 year | -$1,231 |
| -$3,357 | Net after 2 years | -$2,091 |
| -$4,829 | Net after 3 years | -$2,952 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E9Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-4.03/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or Ebang Ebit E9?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: which fits a residential setup better?
The Ebang Ebit E9 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 126.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (45.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).