Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Ebang Ebit E12+

Ebang Ebit E12+

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 2,500 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E9

Ebang Ebit E9

Taux de hachage 6.3 TH/s Puissance 1,077 W Efficiency 171.0 J/TH

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Ebang Ebit E9

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Ebang Ebit E12+ Specification Ebang Ebit E9
50.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 6.3 TH/s
2,500 W Consommation électrique 1,077 W
50.0 J/TH Efficiency 171.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
10,500.0 kg Weight
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,675 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Ebang Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Ebang Ebit E12+

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.77
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$4.23
Monthly -$126.86
Yearly -$1,543.40

Ebang Ebit E9

Daily Revenue 0.00000290 BTC $0.22
Daily Electricity -$2.58
Daily Profit -$2.36
Monthly -$70.85
Yearly -$861.98

Based on BTC price of $76,991 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Ebang Ebit E12+ comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 694% more hashrate (50.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Ebang Ebit E12+ — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Ebang Ebit E12+ and Ebang Ebit E9 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 694% more hashrate (50.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 57% better power draw (2,500 vs 1,077 W)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 71% better efficacité (50.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 132% more heat output (8,530 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 19% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Ebang Ebit E12+ Metric Ebang Ebit E9
Upfront cost (MSRP) $370
-$4.23 Daily net profit -$2.36
-$1,543 Net after 1 year -$1,232
-$3,087 Net after 2 years -$2,094
-$4,630 Net after 3 years -$2,956
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Ebang Ebit E9

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Ebang Ebit E12+

50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Ebang Ebit E9: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-4.23/day for the Ebang Ebit E12+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Ebang Ebit E9: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Ebang Ebit E12+ or the Ebang Ebit E9?

The Ebang Ebit E9 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Ebang Ebit E12+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Ebang Ebit E12+ and Ebang Ebit E9 on J/TH?

The Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 121.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (50.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).