Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the NerdOctaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 92% better power draw (2,520 vs 200 W) in the NerdOctaxe Gamma's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 600% more hashrate (56.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 92% better power draw (2,520 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 44% better efficacité (45.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 0.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 1160% more heat output (8,598 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 177% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$1,885 | Net after 1 year | -$669 |
| -$3,357 | Net after 2 years | -$739 |
| -$4,829 | Net after 3 years | -$809 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or NerdOctaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-4.03/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (45.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).