Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the NerdOctaxe Gamma, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 82% better power draw (1,100 vs 200 W) in the NerdOctaxe Gamma's favour. The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and NerdOctaxe Gamma sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 50% more hashrate (12.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 82% better power draw (1,100 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 73% better efficacité (91.7 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 31% better noise (65.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 77% better weight (3.5 vs 0.8 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 450% more heat output (3,753 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 17% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$2.21 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$1,156 | Net after 1 year | -$669 |
| -$1,962 | Net after 2 years | -$739 |
| -$2,768 | Net after 3 years | -$809 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-2.21/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which runs at a lower noise level?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (91.7 vs 25.0 J/TH).