Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.2 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 43 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 147 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $63,220 and current network difficulty as of Jun 8, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe GT l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (1,100.0 vs 43.0 W). The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitaxe GT diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 458% more hashrate (12.0 vs 2.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 96% better power draw (1,100.0 vs 43.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 78% better efficacité (91.7 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 35% better noise (65.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 89% better weight (3.5 vs 0.4 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 2458% more heat output (3,753 vs 147 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 23% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.30 | Daily net profit | -$0.04 |
| -$1,188 | Net after 1 year | -$514 |
| -$2,027 | Net after 2 years | -$529 |
| -$2,865 | Net after 3 years | -$545 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT20.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe GT better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe GT: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 71.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (91.7 vs 20.0 J/TH).