Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 1,100 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 3.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer Slim Edition (S9) l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 19% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,100 W). The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) holds the edge in hashrate and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 17% more hashrate (14.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 19% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,100 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 5% better efficacité (96.4 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 8% better noise (60.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 30% better weight (5.0 vs 3.5 kg)
- Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) 23% more heat output (4,606 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| $299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$2.21 |
| -$1,298 | Net after 1 year | -$1,156 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 2 years | -$1,962 |
| -$3,295 | Net after 3 years | -$2,768 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)91.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or Antminer Slim Edition (S9) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.21/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) or the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) on J/TH?
The Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 4.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (96.4 vs 91.7 J/TH).