Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Consommation électrique | 1,100 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 3.5 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 317% more hashrate (50.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 317% more hashrate (50.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 45% better power draw (2,000 vs 1,100 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 56% better efficacité (40.0 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 7% better noise (70.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 53% better weight (7.5 vs 3.5 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 82% more heat output (6,824 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 24% more score de minage domestique (42.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$3.00 | Daily net profit | -$2.21 |
| -$1,695 | Net after 1 year | -$1,156 |
| -$2,790 | Net after 2 years | -$1,962 |
| -$3,885 | Net after 3 years | -$2,768 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Antminer Slim Edition (S9) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.21/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 51.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (40.0 vs 91.7 J/TH).