Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $76,885 and current network difficulty as of May 26, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the NerdOctaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 90% better power draw (2,000 vs 200 W). The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and NerdOctaxe Gamma sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 525% more hashrate (50.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 90% better power draw (2,000 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 38% better efficacité (40.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 36% better noise (70.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 89% better weight (7.5 vs 0.8 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 900% more heat output (6,824 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 45% more score de minage domestique (42.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$3.03 | Daily net profit | -$0.20 |
| -$1,706 | Net after 1 year | -$671 |
| -$2,813 | Net after 2 years | -$743 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 3 years | -$815 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.20/day compared to $-3.03/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which runs at a lower noise level?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (40.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S17) with...
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Gamma
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe GT
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Hex