Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9i
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9i |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.5 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Consommation électrique | 1,420 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 105.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 11,000.0 kg | Weight | 5,500.0 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,845 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Ebang Ebit E9i
Based on BTC price of $78,193 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 441% more hashrate (73.0 vs 13.5 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9i claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and Ebang Ebit E9i sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 441% more hashrate (73.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 51% better power draw (2,920 vs 1,420 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 62% better efficacité (40.0 vs 105.2 J/TH)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 50% better weight (11,000 vs 5,500 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 106% more heat output (9,963 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9i |
|---|---|---|
| $550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$2.92 |
| -$2,149 | Net after 1 year | -$1,067 |
| -$3,748 | Net after 2 years | -$2,133 |
| -$5,347 | Net after 3 years | -$3,200 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E9iScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) or Ebang Ebit E9i more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9i is more profitable at $-2.92/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9i: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9i: which fits a residential setup better?
The Ebang Ebit E9i scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and Ebang Ebit E9i on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9i runs at 105.2 J/TH — a difference of 65.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (40.0 vs 105.2 J/TH).