Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 73.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 2,920 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 11,000.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,963 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,193 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 89% better efficacité (372.3 vs 40.0 J/TH). That said, the Antminer KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 677% more hashrate (9.4 vs 73.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 17% better power draw (3,500 vs 2,920 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 89% better efficacité (372.3 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer KS3 100% better weight (16.1 vs 11,000.0 kg)
- Antminer KS3 20% more heat output (11,942 vs 9,963 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $550 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$10,943 | Net after 1 year | -$2,149 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$3,748 |
| -$16,828 | Net after 3 years | -$5,347 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) is more profitable at $-4.38/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 332.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficacité (372.3 vs 40.0 J/TH).