Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S5 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 TH/s |
| 1,975 W | Consommation électrique | 590 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 510.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,013 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Bitmain Antminer S5
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 4229% more hashrate (50.0 vs 1.2 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S5 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Bitmain Antminer S5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 4229% more hashrate (50.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S5 70% better power draw (1,975 vs 590 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 92% better efficacité (39.5 vs 510.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 235% more heat output (6,739 vs 2,013 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S5 7% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S5 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.94 | Daily net profit | -$1.37 |
| -$1,486 | Net after 1 year | -$502 |
| -$2,560 | Net after 2 years | -$1,003 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 3 years | -$1,505 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S5Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S5 is more profitable at $-1.37/day compared to $-2.94/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or Bitmain Antminer S5?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S5?
The Bitmain Antminer S5 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S5 runs at 510.8 J/TH — a difference of 471.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficacité (39.5 vs 510.8 J/TH).
