Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 1,975 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 39.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 9,500.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,739 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 39.5 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)'s favour. The Antminer D9 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 2725% more hashrate (1.8 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 30% better power draw (2,839 vs 1,975 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 39.5 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 9,500.0 kg)
- Antminer D9 44% more heat output (9,687 vs 6,739 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $413 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$2.94 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$1,487 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$2,561 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$3,634 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) is more profitable at $-2.94/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,564.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 39.5 J/TH).