Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 33.0 TH/s |
| 1,975 W | Consommation électrique | 2,145 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 8,550.0 kg |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,319 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th), which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 39% better efficacité (39.5 vs 65.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 52% more hashrate (50.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 8% better power draw (1,975 vs 2,145 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 39% better efficacité (39.5 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 10% better weight (9,500 vs 8,550 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 9% more heat output (6,739 vs 7,319 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 8% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$2.94 | Daily net profit | -$3.96 |
| -$1,486 | Net after 1 year | -$3,946 |
| -$2,560 | Net after 2 years | -$5,391 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 3 years | -$6,837 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) is more profitable at $-2.94/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficacité (39.5 vs 65.0 J/TH).