Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 81.0 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 42.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 12,800.0 kg |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 38% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,400 W). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro 53% more hashrate (53.0 vs 81.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 38% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 6% better efficacité (39.5 vs 42.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 26% better weight (9,500 vs 12,800 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro 62% more heat output (7,145 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $404 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$5.25 |
| -$1,919 | Net after 1 year | -$2,319 |
| -$3,057 | Net after 2 years | -$4,234 |
| -$4,196 | Net after 3 years | -$6,149 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-5.25/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro runs at 42.0 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficacité (39.5 vs 42.0 J/TH).