Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)

Taux de hachage 53.0 TH/s Puissance 2,094 W Efficiency 39.5 J/TH
VS
Holic H28

Holic H28

Taux de hachage 28.0 TH/s Puissance 2,100 W Efficiency 75.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Holic H28

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) Specification Holic H28
53.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 28.0 TH/s
2,094 W Consommation électrique 2,100 W
39.5 J/TH Efficiency 75.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
9,500.0 kg Weight
7,145 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Holic

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00002439 BTC $1.90
Daily Electricity -$5.03
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.63
Yearly -$1,139.12

Holic H28

Daily Revenue 0.00001289 BTC $1.01
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.03
Monthly -$121.01
Yearly -$1,472.31

Based on BTC price of $78,095 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 47% better efficacité (39.5 vs 75.0 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) — l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Holic H28 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 89% more hashrate (53.0 vs 28.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 47% better efficacité (39.5 vs 75.0 J/TH)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) Metric Holic H28
$780 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.12 Daily net profit -$4.03
-$1,919 Net after 1 year -$1,472
-$3,058 Net after 2 years -$2,945
-$4,197 Net after 3 years -$4,417
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)

39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Holic H28?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-4.03/day for the Holic H28. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Holic H28 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Holic H28: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Holic H28 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Holic H28 runs at 75.0 J/TH — a difference of 35.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (39.5 vs 75.0 J/TH).