Antminer S17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M20S |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 68.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 3,360 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 49.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 12,500.0 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S17, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 25% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,360 W) in the Antminer S17's favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S17 and MicroBT Whatsminer M20S sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 21% more hashrate (56.0 vs 68.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 25% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,360 W)
- Antminer S17 9% better efficacité (45.0 vs 49.4 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 100% better weight (9.5 vs 12,500.0 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 33% more heat output (8,598 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 282% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer S17 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M20S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $66 |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | -$5.62 |
| -$1,472 | Net after 1 year | -$2,116 |
| -$2,943 | Net after 2 years | -$4,166 |
| -$4,415 | Net after 3 years | -$6,216 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S1745.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17 or MicroBT Whatsminer M20S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 is more profitable at $-4.03/day compared to $-5.62/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S17 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S?
The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S runs at 49.4 J/TH — a difference of 4.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficacité (45.0 vs 49.4 J/TH).