Antminer D9 vs Antminer S17
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S17 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 3 head-to-head factors. The Antminer D9 runs 1,770.0 GH/s; the Antminer S17 runs 56.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Antminer S17 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 56.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 2,520 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,598 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Antminer S17
Based on BTC price of $64,886 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer S17 l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 45.0 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Antminer S17 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S17 3064% more hashrate (1.8 vs 56.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 11% better power draw (2,839 vs 2,520 W)
- Antminer S17 97% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17 41% better weight (16.1 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer D9 13% more heat output (9,687 vs 8,598 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Antminer S17 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.76 | Daily net profit | -$4.22 |
| -$5,466 | Net after 1 year | -$1,540 |
| -$7,932 | Net after 2 years | -$3,080 |
| -$10,398 | Net after 3 years | -$4,620 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S1745.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer D9 vs Antminer S17: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17 is more profitable at $-4.22/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer D9 vs Antminer S17: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer D9 vs Antminer S17: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Antminer S17?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,559.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).