Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M30S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Whatsminer M30S+
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 13% better efficacité (29.6 vs 34.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)'s favour. The Whatsminer M30S+ holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Whatsminer M30S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 10% more hashrate (110 vs 100 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 4% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 13% better efficacité (29.6 vs 34.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 5% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$3.84 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$1,762 | Net after 1 year | -$3,465 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$5,130 |
| -$4,567 | Net after 3 years | -$6,795 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or Whatsminer M30S+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Whatsminer M30S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or Whatsminer M30S+?
The Whatsminer M30S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M30S+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M30S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Whatsminer M30S+ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S+ runs at 34.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficacité (29.6 vs 34.0 J/TH).
