Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 841 |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.6 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Consommation électrique | 1,290 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 94.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,402 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 885% more hashrate (134.0 vs 13.6 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Canaan AvalonMiner 841 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 885% more hashrate (134.0 vs 13.6 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 55% better power draw (2,881 vs 1,290 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 77% better efficacité (21.5 vs 94.9 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 100% better weight (14.4 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 123% more heat output (9,830 vs 4,402 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 841 |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.09 | Daily net profit | -$2.61 |
| -$1,246 | Net after 1 year | -$951 |
| -$2,010 | Net after 2 years | -$1,903 |
| -$2,773 | Net after 3 years | -$2,854 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 841Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 841?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-2.09/day compared to $-2.61/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 841. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 841: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Canaan AvalonMiner 841 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 runs at 94.9 J/TH — a difference of 73.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (21.5 vs 94.9 J/TH).