Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 134.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 2,881 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,830 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Based on BTC price of $78,194 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 94% better efficacité (372.3 vs 21.5 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)'s favour. The Antminer KS3 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 1326% more hashrate (9.4 vs 134.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 18% better power draw (3,500 vs 2,881 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 94% better efficacité (372.3 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 11% better weight (16.1 vs 14.4 kg)
- Antminer KS3 21% more heat output (11,942 vs 9,830 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $483 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$2.09 |
| -$10,943 | Net after 1 year | -$1,247 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$2,011 |
| -$16,828 | Net after 3 years | -$2,774 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-2.09/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 350.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (372.3 vs 21.5 J/TH).