Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 354.0 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Consommation électrique | 5,133 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 17,514 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 164% more hashrate (134 vs 354 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 164% more hashrate (134 vs 354 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 44% better power draw (2,881 vs 5,133 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 33% better efficacité (21.5 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 20% better weight (14.4 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 78% more heat output (9,830 vs 17,514 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.09 | Daily net profit | $0.42 |
| -$1,247 | Net after 1 year | +$152 |
| -$2,011 | Net after 2 years | +$304 |
| -$2,776 | Net after 3 years | +$455 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76$2.51/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M76Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7614.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 is more profitable at $0.42/day compared to $-2.09/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M76: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M76 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 7.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (21.5 vs 14.5 J/TH).