Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16XP
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16XP |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,850 W |
| 36.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,136 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Canaan Avalon A16XP
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon A16XP l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 233% more hashrate (90.0 vs 300.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) and Canaan Avalon A16XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 233% more hashrate (90.0 vs 300.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 16% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,850 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 64% better efficacité (36.1 vs 12.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 18% more heat output (11,089 vs 13,136 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16XP |
|---|---|---|
| $405 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,280 |
| -$4.56 | Daily net profit | $1.55 |
| -$2,071 | Net after 1 year | -$3,716 |
| -$3,737 | Net after 2 years | -$3,151 |
| -$5,403 | Net after 3 years | -$2,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~7.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16XP$6.11/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A16XPScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A16XP12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.55/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16XP: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) or Canaan Avalon A16XP?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) and Canaan Avalon A16XP on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) runs at 36.1 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH — a difference of 23.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (36.1 vs 12.8 J/TH).