Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 36.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 2445552% more hashrate (0.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 2445552% more hashrate (0.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 32% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 36.1 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 48% more heat output (7,506 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 82% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $405 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$2,071 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$3,736 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$5,402 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)36.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) is more profitable at $-4.56/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) runs at 36.1 J/TH — a difference of 597,790.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 36.1 J/TH).