Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 104.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.0 TH/s |
| 3,068 W | Consommation électrique | 2,380 W |
| 29.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 10,468 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 181% more hashrate (104.0 vs 37.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) 181% more hashrate (104.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 22% better power draw (3,068 vs 2,380 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) 54% better efficacité (29.5 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 42% better weight (13,200 vs 7,600 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) 29% more heat output (10,468 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 18% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $398 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.63 | Daily net profit | -$4.39 |
| -$1,724 | Net after 1 year | -$1,601 |
| -$3,051 | Net after 2 years | -$3,201 |
| -$4,377 | Net after 3 years | -$4,802 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)29.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) is more profitable at $-3.63/day compared to $-4.39/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) runs at 29.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 34.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (29.5 vs 64.3 J/TH).