Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 2,380 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1366, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 251% more hashrate (130.0 vs 37.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1366's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Avalon A1366 251% more hashrate (130.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 27% better power draw (3,250 vs 2,380 W)
- Avalon A1366 61% better efficacité (25.0 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Avalon A1366 100% better weight (12.6 vs 7,600.0 kg)
- Avalon A1366 37% more heat output (11,089 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1366 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$4,639 | Net after 1 year | -$1,599 |
| -$5,779 | Net after 2 years | -$3,198 |
| -$6,918 | Net after 3 years | -$4,797 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1366Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 39.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (25.0 vs 64.3 J/TH).