Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Taux de hachage 130.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1446

Avalon A1446

Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s Puissance 3,310 W Efficiency 24.5 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Avalon A1446

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Avalon A1446
130.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s
3,250 W Consommation électrique 3,310 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 24.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.6 kg Weight 12.8 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,294 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005982 BTC $4.68
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.59
Yearly -$1,138.66

Avalon A1446

Daily Revenue 0.00006212 BTC $4.86
Daily Electricity -$7.94
Daily Profit -$3.08
Monthly -$92.51
Yearly -$1,125.52

Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1446 l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 4% more hashrate (130 vs 135 TH/s). The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1446 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1366 and Avalon A1446 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1446 4% more hashrate (130 vs 135 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1366 2% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,310 W)
  • Avalon A1446 2% better efficacité (25.0 vs 24.5 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1366 2% better weight (12.6 vs 12.8 kg)
  • Avalon A1446 2% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,294 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1366 Metric Avalon A1446
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$3.12 Daily net profit -$3.08
-$4,639 Net after 1 year -$4,326
-$5,777 Net after 2 years -$5,451
-$6,916 Net after 3 years -$6,577
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1446

24.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1366 vs Avalon A1446: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1446 is more profitable at $-3.08/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1366 vs Avalon A1446: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Avalon A1446?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Avalon A1366 and Avalon A1446 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH — a difference of 0.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficacité (25.0 vs 24.5 J/TH).