Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1346

Avalon A1346

Taux de hachage 110.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1446

Avalon A1446

Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s Puissance 3,310 W Efficiency 24.5 J/TH

Avalon A1346 vs Avalon A1446

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Quick verdict

For most buyers the Avalon A1446 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1346 runs 110.0 TH/s at 30 J/TH; the Avalon A1446 runs 135.0 TH/s at 24.5 J/TH.

Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1346 Specification Avalon A1446
110.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 3,310 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 24.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 12.8 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,294 BTU/hr
8/100 Home Mining Score 8/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1346

Daily Revenue 0.00005535 BTC $3.59
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$4.33
Monthly -$129.92
Yearly -$1,580.75

Avalon A1446

Daily Revenue 0.00006793 BTC $4.40
Daily Electricity -$7.94
Daily Profit -$3.54
Monthly -$106.17
Yearly -$1,291.77

Based on BTC price of $64,845 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1446 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 23% more hashrate (110 vs 135 TH/s). The Avalon A1346 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1446 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1346 and Avalon A1446 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1446 23% more hashrate (110 vs 135 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1446 18% better efficacité (30.0 vs 24.5 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1346 4% better weight (12.3 vs 12.8 kg)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1346 Metric Avalon A1446
$2,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$4.33 Daily net profit -$3.54
-$4,381 Net after 1 year -$4,492
-$5,961 Net after 2 years -$5,784
-$7,542 Net after 3 years -$7,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1446

24.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Foire aux questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1346 or the Avalon A1446?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1446 is more profitable at $-3.54/day compared to $-4.33/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1346 vs Avalon A1446: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Avalon A1446?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1346 and Avalon A1446?

The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH — a difference of 5.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficacité (30.0 vs 24.5 J/TH).