Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1246

Avalon A1246

Taux de hachage 90.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1446

Avalon A1446

Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s Puissance 3,310 W Efficiency 24.5 J/TH

Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1446

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1246 Specification Avalon A1446
90.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 135.0 TH/s
3,420 W Consommation électrique 3,310 W
38.0 J/TH Efficiency 24.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 12.8 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,294 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1246

Daily Revenue 0.00004142 BTC $3.24
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$4.97
Monthly -$149.12
Yearly -$1,814.33

Avalon A1446

Daily Revenue 0.00006212 BTC $4.86
Daily Electricity -$7.94
Daily Profit -$3.09
Monthly -$92.64
Yearly -$1,127.17

Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1446 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 35% better efficacité (38.0 vs 24.5 J/TH) in the Avalon A1446's favour. The Avalon A1246 holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1446 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1246 and Avalon A1446 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1446 50% more hashrate (90.0 vs 135.0 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1446 3% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,310 W)
  • Avalon A1446 35% better efficacité (38.0 vs 24.5 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1246 4% better weight (12.3 vs 12.8 kg)
  • Avalon A1246 3% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,294 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1246 Metric Avalon A1446
$1,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$4.97 Daily net profit -$3.09
-$3,614 Net after 1 year -$4,327
-$5,429 Net after 2 years -$5,454
-$7,243 Net after 3 years -$6,582
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1446

24.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1446 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1446 is more profitable at $-3.09/day compared to $-4.97/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1446?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1446?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Avalon A1246 and Avalon A1446 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH — a difference of 13.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficacité (38.0 vs 24.5 J/TH).