Avalon A1446 vs Avalon A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Avalon A1466 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1446 runs 135.0 TH/s at 24.5 J/TH; the Avalon A1466 runs 150.0 TH/s at 21.5 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1446 | Specification | Avalon A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 135.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 TH/s |
| 3,310 W | Consommation électrique | 3,230 W |
| 24.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 11,294 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1446
Avalon A1466
Based on BTC price of $64,845 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1466, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 12% better efficacité (24.5 vs 21.5 J/TH). The Avalon A1446 holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1446 and Avalon A1466 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Avalon A1466 11% more hashrate (135 vs 150 TH/s)
- Avalon A1466 2% better power draw (3,310 vs 3,230 W)
- Avalon A1466 12% better efficacité (24.5 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Avalon A1446 2% more heat output (11,294 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1446 | Metric | Avalon A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,200 |
| -$3.54 | Daily net profit | -$2.86 |
| -$4,492 | Net after 1 year | -$5,243 |
| -$5,784 | Net after 2 years | -$6,286 |
| -$7,075 | Net after 3 years | -$7,329 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Avalon A1446 or Avalon A1466 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-2.86/day compared to $-3.54/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1446 vs Avalon A1466: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Avalon A1446 vs Avalon A1466: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Avalon A1446 vs Avalon A1466: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 3.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (24.5 vs 21.5 J/TH).