Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Avalon A1366 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1246 runs 90.0 TH/s at 38 J/TH; the Avalon A1366 runs 130.0 TH/s at 25 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1246 | Specification | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1246
Avalon A1366
Based on BTC price of $64,845 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1366 l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 34% better efficacité (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH). That said, the Avalon A1246 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and Avalon A1366 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1366 44% more hashrate (90.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Avalon A1366 5% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,250 W)
- Avalon A1366 34% better efficacité (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1246 2% better weight (12.3 vs 12.6 kg)
- Avalon A1246 5% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1246 | Metric | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$5.27 | Daily net profit | -$3.56 |
| -$3,724 | Net after 1 year | -$4,799 |
| -$5,648 | Net after 2 years | -$6,098 |
| -$7,572 | Net after 3 years | -$7,396 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1246 or the Avalon A1366?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-3.56/day compared to $-5.27/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1366?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1366: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1366: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 13.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).