Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1246

Avalon A1246

Taux de hachage 90.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 38.0 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1346

Avalon A1346

Taux de hachage 110.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1346

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Quick verdict

For most buyers the Avalon A1346 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1246 runs 90.0 TH/s at 38 J/TH; the Avalon A1346 runs 110.0 TH/s at 30 J/TH.

Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1246 Specification Avalon A1346
90.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 110.0 TH/s
3,420 W Consommation électrique 3,300 W
38.0 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 12.3 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
8/100 Home Mining Score 8/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1246

Daily Revenue 0.00004529 BTC $2.94
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$5.27
Monthly -$158.13
Yearly -$1,923.89

Avalon A1346

Daily Revenue 0.00005535 BTC $3.59
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$4.33
Monthly -$129.91
Yearly -$1,580.54

Based on BTC price of $64,855 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1346, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 21% better efficacité (38.0 vs 30.0 J/TH). That said, the Avalon A1246 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1346 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1246 and Avalon A1346 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1346 22% more hashrate (90.0 vs 110.0 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1346 4% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,300 W)
  • Avalon A1346 21% better efficacité (38.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1246 4% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1246 Metric Avalon A1346
$1,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,800
-$5.27 Daily net profit -$4.33
-$3,724 Net after 1 year -$4,381
-$5,648 Net after 2 years -$5,961
-$7,572 Net after 3 years -$7,542
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1346

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Foire aux questions

Avalon A1246 vs Avalon A1346: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1346 is more profitable at $-4.33/day compared to $-5.27/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1346?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1246 or Avalon A1346?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Avalon A1246 and Avalon A1346 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 8.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficacité (38.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).