Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1346

Avalon A1346

Taux de hachage 110.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Taux de hachage 130.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH

Avalon A1346 vs Avalon A1366

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1346 Specification Avalon A1366
110.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 130.0 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 3,250 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.3 kg Weight 12.6 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,089 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1346

Daily Revenue 0.00005062 BTC $3.96
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$3.96
Monthly -$118.79
Yearly -$1,445.28

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005982 BTC $4.68
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.59
Yearly -$1,138.66

Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1366 l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 17% better efficacité (30.0 vs 25.0 J/TH). The Avalon A1346 holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Avalon A1366 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1346 and Avalon A1366 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1366 18% more hashrate (110 vs 130 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1366 2% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,250 W)
  • Avalon A1366 17% better efficacité (30.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1346 2% better weight (12.3 vs 12.6 kg)
  • Avalon A1346 2% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1346 Metric Avalon A1366
$2,800 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,500
-$3.96 Daily net profit -$3.12
-$4,245 Net after 1 year -$4,639
-$5,691 Net after 2 years -$5,777
-$7,136 Net after 3 years -$6,916
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1366

25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1346 vs Avalon A1366: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-3.96/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1346 vs Avalon A1366: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Avalon A1366?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Avalon A1346 and Avalon A1366 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (30.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).