Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T |
|---|---|---|
| 335.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 TH/s |
| 5,360 W | Consommation électrique | 8,400 W |
| 16.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 18,288 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 28,661 BTU/hr |
| 16/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th)
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) et le Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 49% more hashrate (335 vs 500 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) 36% better power draw (5,360 vs 8,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) 5% better efficacité (16.0 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) 29% better weight (14.2 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 57% more heat output (18,288 vs 28,661 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 219% more score de minage domestique (16.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T |
|---|---|---|
| $3,999 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.81 | Daily net profit | -$2.17 |
| -$4,296 | Net after 1 year | -$793 |
| -$4,592 | Net after 2 years | -$1,586 |
| -$4,889 | Net after 3 years | -$2,379 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500TScore: 51/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th)16.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) is more profitable at $-0.81/day compared to $-2.17/day for the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 16/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S21 Hyd (335Th) runs at 16.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 0.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (16.0 vs 16.8 J/TH).