Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U |
|---|---|---|
| 473.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 860.0 TH/s |
| 5,676 W | Consommation électrique | 11,180 W |
| 12.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 19,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 38,146 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd
Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 49% better power draw (5,676 vs 11,180 W) in the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd and Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U 82% more hashrate (473 vs 860 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 49% better power draw (5,676 vs 11,180 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 8% better efficacité (12.0 vs 13.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U 97% more heat output (19,367 vs 38,146 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U |
|---|---|---|
| $5,099 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,899 |
| $3.41 | Daily net profit | $4.13 |
| -$3,856 | Net after 1 year | -$9,392 |
| -$2,613 | Net after 2 years | -$7,885 |
| -$1,370 | Net after 3 years | -$6,379 |
| Takes ~4.1 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Takes ~7.2 years to pay back at current rates |
At the default rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd reaches break-even first — but plug in your own electricity cost above, since payback shifts sharply with it.
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U$0.72/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd12.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd or Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U is more profitable at $4.13/day compared to $3.41/day for the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd or Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd or the Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd runs at 12.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S21e XP Hyd 3U runs at 13.0 J/TH — a difference of 1.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficacité (12.0 vs 13.0 J/TH).