Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 473.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 5,676 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 12.3 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,367 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 12853161% more hashrate (0.0 vs 473.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd's favour. That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 12853161% more hashrate (0.0 vs 473.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 61% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,676 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 12.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 13% better weight (14.2 vs 12.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 158% more heat output (7,506 vs 19,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 10% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,099 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | $3.39 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$3,863 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,627 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$1,391 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~4.1 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd$8.67/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd12.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd is more profitable at $3.39/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd?
The Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd?
The Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd runs at 12.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,814.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 12.0 J/TH).