Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 473.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 5,676 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 12.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 12.3 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,367 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd
Based on BTC price of $64,316 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 2856% more hashrate (16.0 vs 473.0 TH/s). The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 2856% more hashrate (16.0 vs 473.0 TH/s)
- Antminer AL1 41% better power draw (3,360 vs 5,676 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 94% better efficacité (210.0 vs 12.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 15% better weight (14.5 vs 12.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 69% more heat output (11,464 vs 19,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,099 |
| -$7.60 | Daily net profit | $0.14 |
| -$12,773 | Net after 1 year | -$5,048 |
| -$15,547 | Net after 2 years | -$4,996 |
| -$18,320 | Net after 3 years | -$4,945 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~99.5 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd$7.74/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd12.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd is more profitable at $0.14/day compared to $-7.60/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer AL1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd?
The Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S21 XP Hyd runs at 12.0 J/TH — a difference of 198.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (210.0 vs 12.0 J/TH).