Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) vs StrongU STU-U8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) | Specification | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| 288.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 46.0 TH/s |
| 4,896 W | Consommation électrique | 2,100 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.8 kg | Weight | 8,200.0 kg |
| 16,705 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,165 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th)
StrongU STU-U8
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 526% more hashrate (288.0 vs 46.0 TH/s). The StrongU STU-U8 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) and StrongU STU-U8 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 526% more hashrate (288.0 vs 46.0 TH/s)
- StrongU STU-U8 57% better power draw (4,896 vs 2,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 63% better efficacité (17.0 vs 45.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 100% better weight (13.8 vs 8,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 133% more heat output (16,705 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 69% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) | Metric | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,498 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.39 | Daily net profit | -$3.39 |
| -$2,007 | Net after 1 year | -$1,236 |
| -$2,516 | Net after 2 years | -$2,472 |
| -$3,024 | Net after 3 years | -$3,707 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) or StrongU STU-U8 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) is more profitable at $-1.39/day compared to $-3.39/day for the StrongU STU-U8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) vs StrongU STU-U8: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the StrongU STU-U8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) vs StrongU STU-U8: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) vs StrongU STU-U8: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH — a difference of 28.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (17.0 vs 45.7 J/TH).