Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs StrongU STU-U8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 46.0 TH/s |
| 5,644 W | Consommation électrique | 2,100 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 8,200.0 kg |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,165 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
StrongU STU-U8
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 622% more hashrate (332.0 vs 46.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)'s favour. The StrongU STU-U8 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and StrongU STU-U8 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 622% more hashrate (332.0 vs 46.0 TH/s)
- StrongU STU-U8 63% better power draw (5,644 vs 2,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 63% better efficacité (17.0 vs 45.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 100% better weight (12.8 vs 8,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 169% more heat output (19,257 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 69% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.59 | Daily net profit | -$3.38 |
| -$2,380 | Net after 1 year | -$1,235 |
| -$2,962 | Net after 2 years | -$2,470 |
| -$3,543 | Net after 3 years | -$3,705 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)Score: 44/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs StrongU STU-U8: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is more profitable at $-1.59/day compared to $-3.38/day for the StrongU STU-U8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or the StrongU STU-U8 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the StrongU STU-U8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or StrongU STU-U8?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and StrongU STU-U8?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH — a difference of 28.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (17.0 vs 45.7 J/TH).