Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 PH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.0 TH/s |
| 11,020 W | Consommation électrique | 2,380 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 37,600 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 3035% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 37.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U's favour. That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 3035% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 78% better power draw (11,020 vs 2,380 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 85% better efficacité (9.5 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 363% more heat output (37,600 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 69% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $7,988 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| $15.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$2,409 | Net after 1 year | -$1,599 |
| +$3,170 | Net after 2 years | -$3,198 |
| +$8,749 | Net after 3 years | -$4,797 |
| Pays for itself in ~17 months at current rates | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U$19.67/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3UScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is more profitable at $15.28/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U runs at 9.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 54.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (9.5 vs 64.3 J/TH).