Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 865.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 88.0 TH/s |
| 8,650 W | Consommation électrique | 3,344 W |
| 10.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 42.0 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 29,514 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,410 BTU/hr |
| 16/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 883% more hashrate (865.0 vs 88.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H and Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H 883% more hashrate (865.0 vs 88.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 61% better power draw (8,650 vs 3,344 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H 74% better efficacité (10.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H 100% better weight (42.0 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H 159% more heat output (29,514 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 38% more score de minage domestique (16.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $19,600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $596 |
| $10.36 | Daily net profit | -$4.86 |
| -$15,817 | Net after 1 year | -$2,370 |
| -$12,034 | Net after 2 years | -$4,143 |
| -$8,251 | Net after 3 years | -$5,917 |
| Takes ~5.2 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H$15.22/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)Score: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H10.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H is more profitable at $10.36/day compared to $-4.86/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 16/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H and Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23e U2H runs at 10.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 28.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (10.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).