Bitmain Antminer S5 vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S5 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 590 W | Consommation électrique | 1,674 W |
| 510.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 2,013 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S5
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Q, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 7692% more hashrate (1.2 vs 90.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S5 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S5 and Canaan Avalon Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon Q 7692% more hashrate (1.2 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S5 65% better power draw (590 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 96% better efficacité (510.8 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 184% more heat output (2,013 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 87% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S5 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$1.37 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$502 | Net after 1 year | -$1,575 |
| -$1,003 | Net after 2 years | -$1,859 |
| -$1,505 | Net after 3 years | -$2,143 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S5 or Canaan Avalon Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-1.37/day for the Bitmain Antminer S5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S5 or the Canaan Avalon Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S5 vs Canaan Avalon Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S5 and Canaan Avalon Q?
The Bitmain Antminer S5 runs at 510.8 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 492.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (510.8 vs 18.6 J/TH).