Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1566 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 185.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 1,674 W |
| 18.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1566
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Avalon A1566 et le Canaan Avalon Q sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Avalon A1566 106% more hashrate (185.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 51% better power draw (3,420 vs 1,674 W)
- Avalon A1566 1% better efficacité (18.5 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Q 30% better weight (14.9 vs 10.5 kg)
- Avalon A1566 104% more heat output (11,669 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 56% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1566 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| $5,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$1.55 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$6,066 | Net after 1 year | -$1,576 |
| -$6,633 | Net after 2 years | -$1,861 |
| -$7,199 | Net after 3 years | -$2,145 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A156618.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-1.55/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan Avalon Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Avalon A1566 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1566 or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1566). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Q?
The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 0.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (18.5 vs 18.6 J/TH).