Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 58.0 TH/s |
| 1,323 W | Consommation électrique | 3,000 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 12,700.0 kg |
| 4,514 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo B1L l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 330% more hashrate (13.5 vs 58.0 TH/s) in the iPollo B1L's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) and iPollo B1L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo B1L 330% more hashrate (13.5 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 56% better power draw (1,323 vs 3,000 W)
- iPollo B1L 47% better efficacité (98.0 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 67% better weight (4,200 vs 12,700 kg)
- iPollo B1L 127% more heat output (4,514 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$2.69 | Daily net profit | -$5.11 |
| -$1,047 | Net after 1 year | -$2,297 |
| -$2,029 | Net after 2 years | -$4,164 |
| -$3,010 | Net after 3 years | -$6,031 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) or iPollo B1L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) or the iPollo B1L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) or the iPollo B1L?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs iPollo B1L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 46.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (98.0 vs 51.7 J/TH).