Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 TH/s |
| 1,372 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 4,681 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 829% more hashrate (14.0 vs 130.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 829% more hashrate (14.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 58% better power draw (1,372 vs 3,250 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 74% better efficacité (98.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 137% more heat output (4,681 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$2.79 | Daily net profit | -$3.12 |
| -$1,083 | Net after 1 year | -$1,839 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 2 years | -$2,978 |
| -$3,119 | Net after 3 years | -$4,118 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) is more profitable at $-2.79/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 73.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (98.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).