Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 14.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 1,372 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 4.2 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,681 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th), which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 94% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 98.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)'s favour. That said, the Antminer D9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 691% more hashrate (1.8 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 52% better power draw (2,839 vs 1,372 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 94% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 74% better weight (16.1 vs 4.2 kg)
- Antminer D9 107% more heat output (9,687 vs 4,681 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$6.76 | Daily net profit | -$2.89 |
| -$5,468 | Net after 1 year | -$1,118 |
| -$7,936 | Net after 2 years | -$2,171 |
| -$10,404 | Net after 3 years | -$3,224 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)98.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) is more profitable at $-2.89/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,506.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 98.0 J/TH).