Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 TH/s |
| 1,372 W | Consommation électrique | 3,230 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 4,681 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 971% more hashrate (14.0 vs 150.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 971% more hashrate (14.0 vs 150.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 58% better power draw (1,372 vs 3,230 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 78% better efficacité (98.0 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 135% more heat output (4,681 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $937 |
| -$2.79 | Daily net profit | -$2.35 |
| -$1,083 | Net after 1 year | -$1,796 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 2 years | -$2,656 |
| -$3,119 | Net after 3 years | -$3,515 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 is more profitable at $-2.35/day compared to $-2.79/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 76.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (98.0 vs 21.5 J/TH).