Avalon A1446 vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1446 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 135.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 TH/s |
| 3,310 W | Consommation électrique | 3,230 W |
| 24.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 11,294 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1446
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Based on BTC price of $77,163 and current network difficulty as of May 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 12% better efficacité (24.5 vs 21.5 J/TH) in the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466's favour. The Avalon A1446 claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1446 and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 11% more hashrate (135 vs 150 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 2% better power draw (3,310 vs 3,230 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 12% better efficacité (24.5 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Avalon A1446 2% better weight (12.8 vs 13.0 kg)
- Avalon A1446 2% more heat output (11,294 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1446 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1446 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $937 |
| -$3.15 | Daily net profit | -$2.43 |
| -$4,350 | Net after 1 year | -$1,822 |
| -$5,500 | Net after 2 years | -$2,708 |
| -$6,650 | Net after 3 years | -$3,593 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1446Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1446 or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 is more profitable at $-2.43/day compared to $-3.15/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1446 or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1446 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1446 or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
The Avalon A1446 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1446 vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 3.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (24.5 vs 21.5 J/TH).